|
PLEASE READ THIS MONTH'S POLITICS COLUMN: "THE DISASTER OF BILL BRADY."
PHIL REESE, MARCH 8, 2010: Have you heard of Senate Bill 3447? Well, if you haven't, you should have. **The Bill seems to have gone quiet now after being referred back to the Committee on Assignments,** but had it passed out of the Judiciary committee, you might have lost your job. The bill, which was initially submitted by Senator Bill Brady--who hates us--would have expanded the "Religious Exemption" to the Human Rights Law that protects people from getting fired based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The "Religious Exemption" would suddenly apply to almost every employer imaginable, rendering the employment non-discrimination law virtually useless.
**UPDATE: I ELABORATE FURTHER ON THE PROBLEMS WITH THE SB3447 BILL IN MY LATEST BILERICO.COM BLOG, CHECK IT OUT...
The hubub that erupted when bloggers from around the state--including myself--caught wind of the bill swiftly put it to bed. The Judicial committee chair who had planned to give the bill a hearing when he thought the lead sponsor was still Bill Brady, swiftly re-referred the bill to the Assignments Committee when he learned the sponsor had changed to John O. Jones. The bill isn't exactly dead, but its not going anywhere for now.
In short, Bill Brady is a shady shady, sneaky, evil man.
According to Senator Michael Frerichs, from the 42nd District, Bill Brady is one of the biggest obstacles to equality and progress, and has been for years.
"I can not think of any examples in my three years in the State Senate when Senator Brady extended a hand across the aisle," Frerichs said in an emailed statement.
"This is particularly striking," continued Frerichs, "because for my first two years, due to the super-majority that the Democrats enjoyed and the limited number of seats on the left side of the chamber, I sat on the Republican side of the aisle. I developed many working relationships with Republicans because of my proximity, but Senator Brady was never one of the Republicans to work with or socialize with Democrats."
On the subject of Brady's plan to solve the state's problems by creating term limits, again, Frerichs is skeptical.
"I find it interesting that someone who has served in Springfield for nearly 20 years would advocate for term limits. If Senator Brady truly believed that serving more than 8 years was a problem, then he should have resigned long ago."
Frerichs continued, "As for contribution limits, Democrats passed a bill last year limiting campaign contributions for the first time ever in the state of Illinois and Senator Brady voted against it."
After this, as well as the drama around SB3447, how can we possibly trust a man like Bill Brady to lead our state. A flip-flopper and political maneuver-er who uses people like you and I as pawns in a game for political points, is not someone that the state can afford to have, drunk with power, in our highest office.
PLEASE READ THIS MONTH'S POLITICS COLUMN: "THE DISASTER OF BILL BRADY." |